Thanks to Deborah Ratliff for sending this to me, if you like pass it on!
Phillippians 4:13 I can do all things through Christ which strengthens me.
The road to success is not straight. There is a curve called Failure, a loop called Confusion, speed bumps called Friends, red lights called Enemies, caution lights called Family. You will have flats called Jobs. But, if you have a spare called Determination, an engine calledPerseverance, insurance called Faith, a driver called Jesus, you will make it to a place called Success.
Monday, June 20, 2005
June 20th Thoughts
Yesterday in our Sunday School class we had a brief discussion regarding Creation vs. Evolution. It made me look back into this topic and I found a few new things.
Here are some websites that might interest you.
http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v20/i3/big_bang.asp
Stars could not have come from the ‘big bang’
Evolutionists generally believe that stars formed by the collapse of gas clouds under gravity. This is supposed to generate the millions of degrees required for nuclear fusion.
But most clouds would be so hot that outward pressure would prevent collapse. Evolutionists must find a way for the cloud to cool down. One such mechanism might be through molecules in the cloud colliding and radiating enough of the heat away.
But according to theory, the ‘big bang’ made mainly hydrogen, with a little heliumæ„æthe other elements supposedly formed inside stars. Helium can't form molecules at all, so the only molecule that could be formed would be molecular hydrogen (H2). Even this is easily destroyed by ultraviolet light, and usually needs dust grains to formæ„æand dust grains require heavier elements. So the only coolant left is atomic hydrogen, and this would leave gas clouds over a hundred times too hot to collapse.
Abraham Loeb of Harvard’s Center for Astrophysics says: ‘The truth is that we don't understand star formation at a fundamental level.’1 Reference Marcus Chown, ‘Let there be light’, New Scientist 157(2120):26-30, 7 February 1998.
Here are a few more:
http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v7/i1/moondust.asp
http://detailshere.com/
http://www.creationmoments.com/
http://www.harrypottermagic.org/Evolution%20of%20Creationist/Chapter%2007.htm
Here are some websites that might interest you.
http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v20/i3/big_bang.asp
Stars could not have come from the ‘big bang’
Evolutionists generally believe that stars formed by the collapse of gas clouds under gravity. This is supposed to generate the millions of degrees required for nuclear fusion.
But most clouds would be so hot that outward pressure would prevent collapse. Evolutionists must find a way for the cloud to cool down. One such mechanism might be through molecules in the cloud colliding and radiating enough of the heat away.
But according to theory, the ‘big bang’ made mainly hydrogen, with a little heliumæ„æthe other elements supposedly formed inside stars. Helium can't form molecules at all, so the only molecule that could be formed would be molecular hydrogen (H2). Even this is easily destroyed by ultraviolet light, and usually needs dust grains to formæ„æand dust grains require heavier elements. So the only coolant left is atomic hydrogen, and this would leave gas clouds over a hundred times too hot to collapse.
Abraham Loeb of Harvard’s Center for Astrophysics says: ‘The truth is that we don't understand star formation at a fundamental level.’1 Reference Marcus Chown, ‘Let there be light’, New Scientist 157(2120):26-30, 7 February 1998.
Here are a few more:
http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v7/i1/moondust.asp
http://detailshere.com/
http://www.creationmoments.com/
http://www.harrypottermagic.org/Evolution%20of%20Creationist/Chapter%2007.htm
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)